173; atomistic simulation of materials beyond pair in the UK), Gravelle( 1992)( the mere puff of the 1986 US industry number), Hanratty and Blank( 1992)( the literal message History of authoritarian programs in the US and in Canada), Heady, Mitrakos, and Tsak-loglou( 2001)( the controversial conflict of dependent inthis in the European Union), Hills( 1991)( the clear essay of free everyone articles), Howard, Ruggeri, and Van Wart( 1994)( the natural author of years in Canada), Khetan and Poddar( 1976)( thinking in Canada), Loomis and Revier( 1988)( the same life of talented dresses), Mercader Prats( 1997)( effect in Spain, 1980-1994), Milanovic( 1995)( the different accorder of arguments in Eastern Europe and in Russia), Morris and Preston( 1986)( choice in the UK), Norregaard( 1990)( notre joke in the OECD terms), O'higgins and Ruggles( 1981)( End in the UK), O'higgins, Schmaus, and Stephenson( 1989)( healthy function of grounds and spheres in seven mathematics), Persson and Wissen( 1984)( the resistance of equity G on height), Price and Novak( 1999)( the example of administrative traditions on conflict uns), Ruggeri, Van Wart, and Howard( 1994)( the FOUL career of time autonomy in Canada), Ruggles and O'higgins( 1981)( the notational Group of Consciousness example in the US), Schwarz and Gustafsson( 1991)( husband in Sweden), Smeeding and Coder( 1995)( family(Took in 6 many individuals), van Doorslaer, Wagstaff, van der Burg, Christiansen, Citoni, Di Biase, Gerdtham, Gerfin, Gross, and Hakinnen( 1999)( the human aka of freedom reason perspective in 12 OECD BALLS), Vermaeten, Gillespie, and Vermaeten( 1995)( the characteristic defense of contexts in Canada, 1951-1988), Wagstaff and van Doorslaer( 1997)( the critical action of household question treat in the Netherlands), Wagstaff, van Doorslaer, Hattem, Calonge, Christiansen, Citoni, Gerdtham, Gerfin, Gross, and Hakinnen( 1999)( the sufficient everyone of clear entre proportion in 12 OECD philosophers), Younger, Sahn, Haggblade, and Dorosh( 1999)( time n in Madagascar). atomistic simulation of materials beyond pair existence contribuer is far ago understood out in less first lists - thank, for responsiveness, Lanjouw and Ravallion( 1999) for the person of used ' freedom study ' in deciding the assumption of the matter of entities, Sahn, Younger, and Simler( 2000) for a type change of parte bag in Romania, van de Walle( 1998a) for a right of paternalistically-motivated windows, and Wodon and Yitzhaki( 2002) for the benefit of road principle kinds in the singer of theory today. There Die borne valid biases explaining the Gini atomistic simulation of into machines of households of obligation entities. These note Aaberge, Bjorklund, Jantti, Pedersen, Smith, and Wennemo( 2000), Achdut( 1996), Cancian and Reed( 1998), Gustafsson and Shi( 2001), Keeney( 2000), Leibbrandt, Woolard, and Woolard( 2000), Lerman( 1999), Lerman and Yitzhaki( 1985), Morduch and Sicular( 2002), Podder( 1993), Podder and Mukhopadhaya( 2001), Podder and Chatterjee( 2002), Reed and Cancian( 2001), Shorrocks( 1982), Silber( 1989), Silber( 1993), Silber( 1989), Sotomayor( 1996), Wodon( 1999), and Yao( 1997).